Related%20passage for Eruvin 189:8

איתמר רב חייא בר יוסף אמר הלכה כרבי יוסי ושמואל אמר הלכה כרבי יהודה

while Raba ruled that it was invalid because he does not uphold the principle that the edge of the ceiling is deemed to descend and to close up.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cf. supra 93a, Suk. 18b.');">¹⁸</span> Now must it be assumed that Abaye is of the same view as Rab while Raba is of the same view as Samuel? According to the view of Samuel there is no divergence of opinion between them.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Abaye and Raba; sc. even Abaye must admit that Samuel who did not accept, in the case of the Sabbath, the principle of the downward extension of the edges of an exedra (though these were expressly made for that structure) could not accept that principle in the case of a sukkah');">¹⁹</span>

Explore related%20passage for Eruvin 189:8. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.